this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

Green - An environmentalist community

5314 readers
39 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!


RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith


Related communities:


Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Hmm, diversity of tactics is needed indeed, but this has a strong potential to have unintended side effects and a public back-lash, so not sure. I guess its a suitable tactic in some cases but should not be talked about much?

[–] chobeat@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

have you watched the video till the end?

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 years ago

Yes? I didn't claim to add a big bold additional insight to the video. I was merely stating my opinion about it. And no, MalcomX threatening violence is not the same as actual infrastructure sabotage, so the video makes a false analogy there.

[–] helios@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Unfortunately, there's no time to think about unintend side effects or a public backlash. We have to regain the momentum lost in 2019 due to the pandemic, and direct action is the only way. Even if it unfortunately inconveniences the everyday public in the short run, it will keep the idea of climate change happening at the forefront and not allow it to fade away from public memory. We cannot allow it to.