this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2021
26 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

31135 readers
361 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

🤦🤦

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 years ago (2 children)

which graphene retaliated too by denying calyx the right to use their code

If they're actually open source, this should be literally impossible.

[–] jedrax@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Talk about just throwing the licenses out the window. It’s still open source, since you can read it all to audit, but the use of the code is no longer free with attribution if they decide a single person cannot use it.

Though there’s no way the maintainer cares about this. Given how long this dick measuring contest has been going for.

[–] AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago (2 children)

Talk about just throwing the licenses out the window. It’s still open source, since you can read it all to audit, but the use of the code is no longer free with attribution if they decide a single person cannot use it.

Actually, most open source licenses (including GPL) have a clause saying that the freedoms granted by the license cannot be revoked as long as the user follows the obligations (namely crediting the author and making their changes open source).

[–] jedrax@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 years ago

That's why I said they're throwing the license out the window. Flagrantly disregarding the text of the license.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 years ago

They can change the license for future releases, which would basically block them from using the updated source code.

[–] zote@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 years ago

I'm no legal expert, but it's something to do with the fact that the original code for this was not open source, and was written by a dev not associated with either project. Some Graphene dev updated it for android 12, under whatever license, which somehow meant they could tell calyx they couldn't use the code for android 12. I seem to remember reading somewhere that Graphene are rewriting the code under a full OS license, which they said they would have no issue with calyx using that under the rules of that license.