No lol. But some of your reasoning is based on untrustworthy news outlets. As well as the video you uncritically linked tells me that maybe you’re not that picky with reliable sources. ^^

It is true that the Ukraine did hinder the IAEA from entering the occupied power plant, but that would argue that they wouldn’t side with the Ukraine. Your reasoning is contradictory and mostly based on unreliable news sources is all I’m saying.

Who knows. Or maybe they shelled those ukranian commandos you wrote about. The russians haven’t really been that careful about their troops in a nuclear environment.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No lol. But some of your reasoning is based on untrustworthy news outlets.

Not toeing US State Department nor belonging to the western media oligopoly does not automatically means outlet is "untrustworthy".

but that would argue that they wouldn’t side with the Ukraine. Your reasoning is contradictory

It isn't contradictory because IAEA is not independent agency, it depends on UN and UN is mostly western controlled and it's very often used instrumentally to directly or indirectly support or whitewash western imperialism (i mean just remember Korea, Yugoslavia, Rwanda etc.), that's why the final report is inconsistent with previous statements.

Or maybe they shelled those ukranian commandos you wrote about.

If you even read those articles i linked you would know there were multiple shellings and the raid was stopped 3 km from the facility.

The russians haven’t really been that careful about their troops in a nuclear environment.

And you know this from where?

[–] Flavourful@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh my, I'm not going to continue this. I was curious about your claim of IAEA sideing with Ukraine and I got an answer for that, thank you.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

we have a lost redditor here