this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
188 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

3 readers
10 users here now

Talk about anything tech related!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] animist@lemmy.one 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm not American, does your country consider this anti-competitive behavior?

[–] Revezd@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wasn’t there just a case where they ruled that a homophobic bunch can refuse services to LGBTQI+ members? If so, this might fall under the same freedom of business. I however think it’s really sad (especially in the above described case).

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But what if some of the judges have a personal dislike of Twitter? Would it matter who bribed Thomas more?

[–] zalack@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure that ruling specifically relied on the denial of service being an expression of religious belief, which would be a hard sell here.

(Also, not endorsing the ruling, that's just my understanding of it).

[–] WookieMunster@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wouldn’t that be a bit of a stretch? In the first case they’re refusing patrons while Twitter is blocking a whole service/platform

[–] fuckyou_m8@lemmy.fmhy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't have to be American, if twitter works in your country, then it should at least on your country follow your rules or they could be blocked by your ISP

[–] animist@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's not what I am asking. Are there anti-monopoly laws in the United States that would prevent Twitter from blocking links to their competitor?

[–] PoopingCough@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Technically yes there are anti-monopoly laws in the US, however they aren't really used much anymore because so much of politics is dominated by corporate money now

[–] fuckyou_m8@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yep, decisions like not allowing movie distribution companies to own any cinema would not happen these days

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

Twitter's not anywhere near being a monopoly in any market though.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Generally speaking, anti-competition laws here are focused on abusing a monopoly, and Twitter very much is not a monopoly, especially given the extremely successful emergence of a strong competitor.