this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
5 points (57.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7211 readers
627 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We could make some meaningful changes, but it would annoy a ton of people, such as:

  • phase out SS benefits for wealthier people, and increase/eliminate SS income tax cap
  • end "use it or lose it" budgeting so agencies don't feel like they need to spend a ton at the end of the year; perhaps roll over 70% of the unused budget?
  • increase IRS budget, and allow them to launch their own tax prep software
  • audit spending for defense - we spend way too much, and there's undoubtedly a ton of corruption
  • close down certain foreign military bases and trust our allies to defend themselves

But none of that is going to happen because reasons. I think the above could get us to a balanced budget without too much pain, though we may need to increase taxes a little or make more painful cuts.

Regardless, a lot of the debt is held by the government and US citizens, so it's not nearly as big of a pound as people make it out to be, but it's still a problem and nobody seems interested in actually fixing it.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Going back to pre-Reagan tax policy alone would be huge, and like you say, the SS income tax cap.

I don't think we need to go back to pre-Reagan tax policy. We don't need to jack up top tax rates to 50% again, we just need to enforce the tax code we already have and eliminate loopholes.

That alone should bring in hundreds of billions. When paired with some cuts and audits, we should be able to balance the budget.