Linux
Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
-
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
-
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
-
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
-
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
-
No NSFW adult content
-
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
view the rest of the comments
Got some time so I'll elaborate: which type of device has the best balance of price, speed and reliability? I would use that for the OS. Would the other type of device be worth it for rest of the data? Or should I go all in on the same technology? I've always preferes to keep these two on separate "hard drives".
NVME is a physical size standard A NVME SSD and a normal 2.5 inch SSD are the same tech different form factor. NVMEs are a bit more expensive normally. Just look for a SSD that has 3d nand cache the more the better. Though I will note since the NVME SSDs are physically closed to the CPU and South bridge they are a mote faster.