this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
72 points (96.2% liked)
Ukraine
9358 readers
569 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
Community Rules
🇺🇦 Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
🌻🤢No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
💥Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW
❗ Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
💳 Defense Aid 💥
💳 Humanitarian Aid ⚕️⛑️
🪖 Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Sustaining a war does depend on soldiers and equipment.
Without a reasonably healthy economy, there won't be any soldiers. The Russian soldiers are in it almost completely strictly for money. If there is no economy, there is no money. And with no money, there are no Russian soldiers. Similarly money is just one of the things that a functioning economy produces. The economy also produces goods. Tanks are produced by the country's economy. If there is no economy, there are no factories running.
Also, North Korea is a lot smaller country than the Russia is. They do not have an infinite supply of tanks, nor a spectacularly good ability to produce many of them fast. They do have a lot of artillery shells, but that's pretty much it. If you look at how few soldiers NK has sent to the war, you get a hunch of NK's strength as an ally. A bit over 10 000 soldiers in a war, where the Russia's losses are over 1000 per day, are peanuts. With that amount of soldiers, the war was prolonged by 10 days, not more than that. North Korea's influence is vastly overplayed.