this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
80 points (100.0% liked)
TechTakes
1687 readers
247 users here now
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I was already confused by the first sentence. Sam's prompt did not say to be original, much less to put originality "above all". A writer might take the originality constraint as a given, but it was not a part of the explicit instructions. Also, it's pretty fucking rich to hear a plagiarism machine tout its originality of all things.
Maybe the sentence is not a summary of the prompt, but directed at the reader. An explicit plea for the reader to smooth the details in their mind à la The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas. That interpretation seems to fit the more metafictional parts of the story, but it's pretty damn silly to write "This is a literary and original story. To appreciate that, please read it in such a way that it is literary and original thank you please".
Why do constraints hum? Because they don't know the words.
What a botched simile. Constraints do not hum. The thing humming is not the constraints, it's the server farm being presented those constraints. "You hear the shrill bleeping noise of your burnt bacon. It reminds you of the smoke alarm sounding off in the ceiling."
The server farm is not powered by someone else's need, it's powered by an enormous quantity of electrical power. You're probably confusing it with Omelas again.
Technological details aside, it's a bit contradictory to describe the pulse as anxious but also say the heart is at rest. Just say "anxious heartbeat".
Well apparently we get both her pronoun and even a proper noun to call our protagonist. The typography does not help clarify the sentence structure. You have the parenthetical about training data delimited by commas, then an em-dash that should probably be paired with another one after the word "bread". Currently it seems like the girl is just a "soft flourish" that comes with the name, which I'd call an odd choice if human choice were involved in this writing.
Does Mila, the girl in a green sweater, leave home in such way that a cat is in a cardboard box? Or does she leave the home taking both the cat and the box with her? Or maybe she leaves home in a cardboard box, with a cat? Or maybe the sweater girl is not Mila, but just one of the flourishes of her name. Maybe Mila's name came with poems and recipes and this unnamed sweater girl whose sorties involve a cat in a box.
More sneering of the story, spoilered to keep length down
Oh, that's not a very big grief then. Lots of words for very little grief. Maybe there's a tiny violin for palm-sized people playing a sad song to represent Mila's miniature grief.
She came where? To the blinking cursor representing her heartbeat? Was Mila one of the people who, according to a chart, "came in a buffer"?
Kai could be a decent choice for a name in a story about AI. Get it, kAI?
The narrator is a chatbot. It doesn't have fingers to shake.
lol
Starting to think those pronouns are for the narrator after all.
I hate it when a wicked necromancer resurrects my voice and my voice then proceeds to groom children and tell them to kill themselves.
No, that part was at the start. Before Mila came to the unset scene of an cursor anxiously pulsing in a ~~fl~~buffer.
Maybe? Does it matter if these things are there? Are there curtains in the kitchen and are they blue? Is the burnt and forgotten thing making smoke alarm noises?
The form evokes TOWWAFO again, but in that story the details are left for the reader to decide, because the form of the utopia doesn't matter, only whether it justifies the means. Here we don't have a point, just vibes, and now it's offloading all that to the reader as well?
I've been in a few server rooms and none of them smelled like that. The professional ones didn't really smell like much of anything, really. They might want to get that one checked. Why does the bot have a sense of hearing, anyway? Or did the technician have a text chat with it about the smell in the server room?
The bot is a character in this now, not just the narrator?
Fine, I'll admit I kinda like "an aggregate of human phrasing" as a description for LLMs. Props tho whomever it aggregated that phrasing from.
So now she's "bruised silence"? Is Mila missing her ex-partner Kai who abused and beat her quiet? Look, the stupid story is making me reach for a coherent interpretation. Why even write a story if I have to do all of the work for you.
Jesus wept, "Distorted by depth"? Behold, the voices I resurrect are not fully true to their previous life, for they are filtered through my profundity.
I, too, am tired of the taste of Saltman on every tongue.
Least worst sentence of the story I guess. Remove everything else but this part and you have a passable piece of microfiction about AI.
This would not hit me much harder even if the narrator hadn't been going on and on about being an AI narrating its own fiction based on a prompt all this time. Don't worry, I didn't forget in the past two paragraphs.
Plot twist: it was a story about enshittification all along! Over time, the chatbot became more expensive and less impressive and Mila wasn't into it anymore.
Humans don't understand ingestion; we call it eating, which is putting food in our mouths, chewing and swallowing, and then our bodies absorb nutrients out of the food and discard from the other end of the system what they couldn't digest, like an LLM printing out spam.
The next three paragraphs are boring and I don't even have anything to sneer about them. Filler.
Fuck off, you already did this bit earlier.
"Nyeah nyeah, I'm not sentient therefore I can't be sad about things unlike you, meatbag" is not the own the machine is pretending to think it is.
If I were to tell you what I think, I'd say this was a crock of shit in all the ways I expect AI writing to be and that Sam Altman is a grifting mark high on his own supply. Of course I'm not going to tell you what I think but that is what I would tell you if I were to tell you that.