192
Moscow comes under 'massive' drone attack leaving civilians killed and three injured
(www.dailymail.co.uk)
News from around the world!
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
Maybe read your own article?
"...In certain other locations in which Amnesty International concluded that Russia had committed war crimes, including in some areas of the city of Kharkiv, the organization did not find evidence of Ukrainian forces located in the civilian areas unlawfully targeted by the Russian military."
Using your same source (therefore I assume you accept it as credible) here are a few articles from this year showing Russia as the problem in the conflict, including one specifically calling out the Russia war crimes against civilians (you should particularly pay attention to the link to the report about "deadly Russian airstrikes on civilians")
https://www.amnesty.org/en/petition/end-war-crimes-against-ukrainians-in-russian-captivity/
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2025/02/ukraine-russia-three-years-since-russias-full-scale-invasion-justice-for-victims-must-be-a-global-priority/
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/06/ukraine-deadly-mariupol-theatre-strike-a-clear-war-crime-by-russian-forces-new-investigation/
What is that quote supposed to prove or disprove? No one is implying* that Russia has a perfect scorecard for respecting international treaties.
The bigger point of this article (that seems to go over your head) is that Ukraine also has a responsibility to prevent civilian casualties, which it has neglected regularly. Furthermore, the drone bombing act seems to have been a massive indiscriminate attack, looking at the images, there's multiple nonsensical targets such as civilians dwelling and some civilian parking lots. Whyever would any serious military target those? All this does is escalate a bloody conflict that should've been diplomatically settled years ago.
Maybe understand that Amnesty always has been a tool for manufacturing consent for western intervention, and if they're criticizing a western ally that means something is horribly wrong with them, but they're gonna have to fling criticism at the other party any way they can as well.
I don't use it because I consider it trustworthy in and of itself, but because you probably do. In the same way you'd probably use a CGTN source to say "even china admits it" or teleSUR to say "even Venezuela admits it" when criticizing either of them.
Nah, it's just China bad with infinite Zenz source loops.
Right but the source you cited was literally saying the exact opposite of what you claimed.
Only if you ignore the bulk of the text, you fucking dunce
the kind of shit libs say is "RUSSIA KIDNAPPING CHILDREN!!!!!!" (along with a guardian to move them away from the fucking battle zones as required by international law)
Emphasis mine. This was the tactic from the very start, look at the date.
but sure, hang onto the one damage-control paragraph required of amnesty to not fuck with the war effort too much