this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
225 points (96.3% liked)

News

27041 readers
8786 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the note, shared internally and viewed by the New York Times, Brin urges staff working on Google’s Gemini AI projects to put in long hours to help the company lead the race in artificial general intelligence (AGI).

Some have praised Brin’s commitment to pushing the company’s success, but others argue that his approach reflects an outdated and harmful mindset.

“The hustle-centric 60-hour week isn’t productivity—it’s burnout waiting to happen,” wrote workplace mental health educator Catherine Eadie in a post shared by LinkedIn’s news editors.

Others said they feel that hard work is essential for success, with a COO of a business analytics business writing, “Brin is just being honest—successful people have always put in long hours."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Okay, but here in the US we have long commutes so I'm concerned about addressing a different problem. There are people at my factory with 40-50 minute commutes at highway speeds. One way. We don't even get paid that much!

This all happened without any incentives for for anyone to increase commute length. It's just a consequence of property markets.

You're concerned about different things than I am.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's because you have moronic zoning laws. The fix is to start by replacing those, not punishing people.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Punishing people by paying them for the time they spend commuting.

Meanwhile, my factory at least would start lobbying for better zoning laws if they had to pay people for the 40-50 minutes they spend driving to work every day.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Punishing people by paying them for the time they spend commuting.

But it's never that easy, is it? Capitalists are going to capitalist and that means you WILL be punished for the extra costs you incur to the company this way.

Maybe it'll work for your factory, but in a big city where city center rent is already ridiculously high despite the significantly higher density than suburbs, you'll just be unfairly punished for not paying twice as much rent if the company is allowed to discriminate. If they're not allowed to discriminate, you can just spread out your commute even further in order to work less for the same money, so where's the incentive in moving closer?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago

We're already punished by being forced to have longer commutes! The company isn't doing the punishment, of course, but the housing market is by pricing people out of the city.

I also don't think the company can demand workers pay higher rent without also paying higher wages. They'll be unable to hire workers if they try. Either the pay increases to match the housing market or they settle for paying commuters.