this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2023
0 points (50.0% liked)

World News

32316 readers
1285 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pingveno@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Why would she mention countries that US has been fucking over for many decades trying to overthrow their government and whose people US sanctions starve in the context of supplying their weapons to Ukraine?

Because one of the foreign policy goals of the US in South America is to reduce Russia's and China's foothold there. That's been the case for decades, and has roots in the days of the Monroe Doctrine.

there is shame in writing comments on the subject you’re not familiar with

Thing is, I'm familiar with the US's relations with the governments of Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. They are, to put it mildly, poor. Meanwhile, their relationship with Russia is quite cozy. This is hardly a secret. That makes your claim utterly inane. It of course totally makes sense when I learned that the only source for the claim is off the cuff remarks from an official. Russia, Russian state media, and Venezuelan state media then ran with this narrative, despite it being bonkers. So hey, maybe don't claim to know vastly more than me when you're falling for stupid claims that are themselves based on a single statement.

If you want to keep arguing, feel free. But before you accuse me of being unwilling to admit to being incorrect, take a look at yourself. You keep defending a claim that the US would take actions that are nonsensical, and you're relying on scant evidence. Are you actually clinging to a falsehood?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago

Because one of the foreign policy goals of the US in South America is to reduce Russia’s and China’s foothold there. That’s been the case for decades, and has roots in the days of the Monroe Doctrine.

She is discussing where US can get old Soviet weapons to send to Ukraine, not geopolitical ambitions US has over Latin America.

So hey, maybe don’t claim to know vastly more than me when you’re falling for stupid claims that are themselves based on a single statement.

I'm not falling for any stupid claims. I'm looking at what a top US official said in plain English. Not sure what part of that you're still struggling with.

You keep defending a claim that the US would take actions that are nonsensical, and you’re relying on scant evidence. Are you actually clinging to a falsehood?

Ah I see the problem was with your reading comprehension all along. My claim is that US is run by imbeciles who make nonsensical statements making your regime the laughing stock of the world.