this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
32 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

66156 readers
7479 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
32
Carbon capture more costly than switching to renewables, researchers find (techxplore.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by realitista@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/5180379

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/technology by /u/nimicdoareu on 2025-02-15 16:52:57+00:00.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Korkki@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago

Water is wet, researchers find

Like basic thermodynamics can tell you that carbon capture sucks efficiency wise. It's more work to pour water on the floor and then mopping it up and putting a back into the bottle, than just not not spilling the water in the first place.