this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
79 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

10156 readers
422 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca
UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
79
@steamdb.info‬ "Players have been asking for the ability to filter out games made with Gen AI. We've added an automatic tag on SteamDB based on the AI gen content disclosures on the store pages." (bsky.app)
submitted 2 weeks ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
105 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Well, there are those who like throwing the sabo's into the machinery, so you're not guaranteed people would ignore the AI creation nature of the great game, when deciding to buy/play the great game. You're already seeing a constant "No AI here!" mindset occuring.

But at some point, AI will be creating, especially if Capitalism can see it succeed and remove the need to pay for workers. We need to think about job-protecting laws today that are just and even-handed, and not just trying to stiff-hand AI creation, as that won't work long term.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Idgaf if ai exists I just don’t want it replacing people without warning where people are way better for the job

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Idgaf if ai exists I just don’t want it replacing people without warning where people are way better for the job

Agreed. We're going to need laws for that though, and right now Congress only listens to Corporations, and Corporations want AI to get rid of those pesky workers that drain away their profits.

But also, you gotta understand that at some point, for some things, AI will be better than humans for particular jobs. When that happens, what then? Force-keep the human on the job, or retrain them, or just tell them "sucks to be you have a nice day" and show them the door, or something else???

This is really the beginning of a monumental time for the species, as big as the introduction of the Internet was. Better start figuring this shit out now, instead of (metaphorically) just covering our ears and yelling "LA! LA! LA! LA! LA! I CAN'T HEAR YOU!" trying to ignore the whole thing.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] oce@jlai.lu 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think what we need to protect is the quality of life rather than the jobs. I wish for a 20h work week at the same QoL.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

I wouldn't disagree with that. Today's reality is that you need a job to obtain a QoL (aka 'pay the bills'). If we could get to a place as a species to where three/four day work weeks were the norm, that would be fine by me.

I'm assuming that at some point in our species future we'll be in a Post-scarcity place, and jobs as we know them now won't be needed. Instead people will have 'hobbies' that they enjoy doing. That's assuming the Morlocks don't eat all the Eloi before the Post-scarcity occurs, that is.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~