198
this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
198 points (99.0% liked)
United States | News & Politics
7383 readers
885 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
One reason it exists is because there's no way to force jurors to rule a certain way. Once jurors go into deliberation, what happens in that room stays in that room.
Taken to its logical conclusion, there's nothing stopping a jury from voting unanimously either way. They could vote to convict a person they think is innocent (which happens, especially when used against minorities and especially during Jim Crow). They could vote "not guilty" for a person they think is guilty.