Programming

17775 readers

339 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

A Better Federated Search (blog.doomsdayrs.page)

submitted 18 hours ago by doomsdayrs@lemmy.ml to c/programming@programming.dev

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've been trying to figure this out for over a year now.

This is my latest concept that I'll try to make.

What do you all think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] doomsdayrs@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

How does a user find the first web ring search engine?

The implication is that such functionality is bundled into this search engine.

What if they don't want that multi step process?

Hard thing, but what are a few steps toavoiding AI spam results?

How do users avoid predatory web rings that are trying to sell them stuff?

That's a moderation issue, alluded to being a problem that should be figured out separate to figuring out this web-ring federation.

How does this compete with existing search?

Existing on the sidelines and possibly leaching off DDG users who want a less bing dependent search.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

What if they don't want that multi step process?

Hard thing, but what are a few steps to avoiding AI spam results?

There's nothing inherent to this proposal that avoids spam or SEO. You describe it as a "moderation issue" and then mark it as out of scope.

If avoiding AI spam or SEO sites is a feature of this proposal, then it should be addressed directly.