this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
589 points (93.1% liked)

Memes

46041 readers
1847 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social -4 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Near as I can tell, a leftist would do anything to keep a liberal out of power over believing only 75% of the same things as them, and allow the right to take control, but at least they get to keep the moral high ground of not allowing a liberal to do that 25%. Never mind that the right actively opposed everything to leftist wants completely.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 hours ago

When discussing liberalism in the context of liberalism vs Leftism, they are faily opposite. Liberalism desires Capitalism, perhaps with some tweaks or larger safety nets, while leftists seek to end Capitalism and pursue Socialism of some form. This isn't "75%" of the same views at all, liberalism is fundamentally entirely incompatible with Leftism just like fascism is incompatible with leftism.

Additionally, in the West, Leftists have not been the deciding factor in elections, liberals have, be they more conservative or more progressive liberals.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

You know, if leberals wanted the support of the leftists, they try something called compromises. But the only compromises they're ready to do is with the fascists unfortunately, which the leftists will never support.

So no, the leftists didn't refuse to make compromises. The liberals did, with the left, because they actually accepted all the compromises with the fascists. And act now surprised that fascism is taking over.

Liberals are spoiled children incapable of taking accountability for their actions.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 20 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Liberals are "the right" and they sure as hell don't believe 75% of the same things as leftists. Leftists in the west also don't really have the power to keep liberals out of power, hence why liberals have consistently been the only ones in power for decades. Liberals on the other hand, absolutely do have the power to keep leftists out, and they will go as far as allying with fascists to murder leftists in their beds.

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world -4 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Liberalism is literally and historically where the left begins. The right is authoritarianism and the left is liberalism to anarchism. Liberals are not leftists but it is a signof a distinct lack of education in political philosophy to claim liberalism as a right wing ideology.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Liberalism didn't exist for most of history, so trying to invoke "history" to argue that liberalism has some kind of timeless and eternal claim to being on the left is unconvincing. Yes, liberalism was the left in the eighteenth century, but we're in the twenty first century.

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The division of political ideologies into left and right derives from the French Parliament which had the monarchists on the right and the liberals on the left.

Every reference to right and left stems from this so yes in fact Liberalism has always been where the left starts even if liberals are nit leftists because the political left is anti-authoritarian.

The binary has not changed and I promise you any claim ypu make to the contrary is going to be mired in euro-centric beliefs.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

I always try to tell the Marxists this, but they always come up with some dumb rebuttal.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Liberalism is the ideological basis of Capitalism. When Capitalism was a progressive force, ie during the French Revolution, it was considered left wing. Now that Capitalism has become entrenched and turned to Imperialism, the progressive side is undeniably Socialism, while liberalism entrenches the status quo.

Simply saying that liberalism at one point was progressive does not mean history has not had several centuries of shifts and developments since then.

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You're being incredibly euro-centric with your claims here.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Your notion of where the modern divide lies is 100% European and won’t hold true when you consider all nations.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Liberalism is european in origin, as Capitalism first truly took hold there. It isn't the "modern divide" but the notion of Liberalism as a progressive motion or regressive motion.

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world -1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Capitalism was first instituted by the first Liberal nation- the USA. Europe was mostly mercantilist

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago

No, the mode of production creates the ideology, not the opposite.