this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
5 points (72.7% liked)

Languages and Linguistics | Polyglots, Language Learners and Linguists!

617 readers
24 users here now

A community for languages, linguistics and people interested in both!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hypothetically, let's say you were tasked with simplifying the English language. how would you go about doing that, and why?

to start with an easy one, the first thing I would do is eliminate silent letters from all words and make it so no letters share sounds. for example, example would become exampel. then, because x would no longer be around or at least wouldn't have that sound, ekzampel. I would also consider eliminating mulit-letter sounds like ch, and replacing them with single characters (probably the ones that got removed).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] thirdBreakfast@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of these answers are working towards the idea of having consistent grapheme (letter or letter combo) to sound (phoneme) relationships. ie the letter 'a' would always represent the same sound, and that sound would always be represented by the letter 'a'. This is called ideal phonemic orthography.

English has whatever the opposite of phonemic orthography is; depending on your accent, the letter 'a' has about 7 sounds the most common being 'o' as in 'what'. It's extremely unhelpful when teaching kids to read English.

Languages seem to pick up a lot of cruft over time as they grow, absorb loanwords and just change because language, so you usually only move towards phonemic orthography with some deliberate act, usually by the government.

An example might be Indonesia really wanting a national language to tie a very diverse population together after the second world war. I think they still have a government department who makes pronouncements about the language. The result of this is you could learn to correctly pronounce Indonesian in about 10 minutes, and read an Indonesian newspaper to a native speaker and it would be almost entirely intelligible to them even though you didn't know the meaning of what you were reading.

[โ€“] unknown1234_5@kbin.earth 2 points 10 hours ago

didn't know there was a word for it but yeah, that's exactly what I had in mind. I'd also want to fix some grammar rules but grammar barely matters anyway (I'm from east texas, grammar is for talking to people who don't know me well enough to decode my slurring).