this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
851 points (97.8% liked)
Funny
7186 readers
1273 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Hard disagree here.
"Forcing simple healthy choices" completely disregards the many and varied causes of obesity.
This type of thinking reminds me of the war on drugs approach to drug abuse.
Quite obviously, the underlying causes of obesity are many and varied. The only way to resolve an "obesity pandemic" is to have more services directed at understanding an individual's unique circumstances and helping them develop strategies to improve their health.
This sounds expensive, and doesn't sound like an election-winning policy in 2025, but that's where we are at.
To be fair, I didn't propose this approach as an absolute solution to the obesity pandemic. I said I agree with this method. There are obviously contributing factors that I've listed elsewhere, but I stand by that - you don't have to agree with me. It can easily be part of a broader strategy.
If you wanted to solve the obesity pandemic, 100% resolved, absolutely you need systemic change and individualized services. And yes lol it would be a wildly expensive endeavour.
Edit: phrasing