Technology

34579 readers

767 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml

E-Mail is 50 years old this month, and it works pretty much the same, which is good, otherwise we'd all have to use one e-mail company (www.sparkpost.com)

submitted 2 years ago by danie10@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Think about it, you can pick an e-mail domain anywhere and use any e-mail client on any platform, to send an e-mail to someone anywhere else... We just take that for granted, but if e-mail were newly invented today by a company like say Meta, all the billions of people in the world would have to belong to that same single company in order to send and receive mail to anyone else...

E-mail's greatest success lies in it's open standards and decentralisation. It will no doubt me replaced at some point in the future, as all technologies will, but let us hope that instant messaging and social networks go back to being open and decentralised (like they too were once).

See https://www.sparkpost.com/blog/a-look-back-at-50-years-of-email/

#technology #email #decentralisation #openstandards #deletemeta

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] je_vv@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It seems cool, particularly if already using gpg for signing/encrypting (it uses autocrypt), however, as based on openpg (gpg), it doesn't support (perfect forward secrecy), but it's the same for gpg signing/encrypting.

What is really bad about delta chat, is that it doesn't support (encrypted keys), which to me is really, really, a bad idea. Even openKeyChain (android) manages encrypted keys, as well as any desktop email client supporting gpg, so I really can't see why delta chat wouldn't.

And though email is decentralized by nature, it still requires an email service provider. You might self host one, but not everyone can, so in the end, it's not much different than having another messenger service, such as xmpp. With the advantage those other messengers support voice/video calls, which delta can't, since it's based on email in the end, and also most support perfect forward secrecy (some through double ratchet e2ee, like xmpp+omemo, or through other means, like jami).

Though in the end, if no additional service is wanted, voice/video calls are not required, and no perfect forward secrecy is required, then delta might be an option. Thunderbird used to offer chatting as well, I'm wondering if it was based on delta chat, or the other way around, :(