this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
223 points (96.3% liked)

Australia

3618 readers
216 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Victorian woman Kathryn Beaton says repeated, illegal denials of service from drivers refusing to allow her guide dog into their vehicles have left her effectively housebound.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] curls@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

In the USA this would be illegal. You can't deny a person with a disability that is accommodated by a service dog unless the dog is not obeying the handler or pees/poops inside. Doesn't matter if someone has allergies, a phobia, or is religious. There are fines but it takes a very long time to get anywhere.

[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It probably shouldn't include allergies...depending on how bad those are sneezing while at the wheel would be very dangerous...

Obviously it should be confirmed by a doctor...but still that sounds dangerous.

[–] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Might also be considered a disability in this case.

[–] fiat_lux@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

It certainly would be if it prevents people from breathing or driving or other parts of their job. Disability is a very inclusive concept, even if many people understandably don't enjoy being counted as being included.

[–] sensibilidades@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter if someone has allergies

That sounds like bullshit, how can that not be a factor? How would, for example, a fear of dogs not be a factor?

[–] kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I can absolutely understand having medically recognized allergies be an acceptable reason to refuse the service.

A fear of dogs doesn't cut it for me. A fear of black people doesn't mean you get to refuse service to them. A person has a right to have their service dog with them.

[–] fiat_lux@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Illegal here too. Law is an empty threat when it's not enforced and the right people/companies aren't sufficiently penalised.

Just like Steve Bannon was sentenced to 4 months jail in Novermber, but has served 0 days in custody.

Not true. Service animals can be denied if they pose an immediate threat to human health or safety. An allergy could certainly be a threat to health, and a driver having an allergic reaction is definitely a threat to safety.

Also, the federal law only applies to public accommodations, I don't think "ride-shares" would count as that. An Uber driver doesn't stop and pick up the first person they see, they have a private agreement with a specific person.