politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Y'all should watch some Fox News. Really. Not just memes, quips and quick video grabs. It's hard to overstate what we're up against.
If you have some education in journalism and psychology, the propaganda isn't subtle at all. But how many people have taken classes like that?
If you think you're too smart to fall for Fox News, remember, lemmy is in no way a representative human cross section. If you're reading this you are far more likely to be educated, and far more likely to be above average IQ. Not trying to be snotty, but the uneducated and stupid usually don't find there way into spaces like this, or they don't stay.
Did you know that they rarely tell an outright lie? They'll let their guests do so, and leave it hanging unquestioned. But sometimes they do push back on bullshit! Just enough push back to lend an air of impartiality. One time at a round-table, one of the Fox guys YELLS out and slams the table, "Obama's a racist!" The other presenters looked at him like, "Uh, a bit much bro?" But no one said a word back at him.
Almost everything said is true. But it's painfully obvious how they inject bias. I was the high school paper co-editor, took a bit of journalism in college. It's really, really hard to write an article with zero bias. I'm trained to spot it. Give me 10-minutes of any given Fox news segment and I will shred it. How many people were trained like I was? Damned few, and that's how they get away with it, 1,000 tiny cuts that you won't even notice.
Google their presenters. Hot, young(ish) blondes and middle-aged white guys. The women are just old enough to not be taken for kids and the men are young enough to not look like geezers. A couple of token minorities sprinkled in to, again, appear impartial. Notice that the rare minority presenter get no real air time. It's obvious as hell once you see them all. Blondes and old guys.
They repeat what they want you to hear ad naseum. But sometimes it's reversed! During the Obama administration they said "Obama" so many times I wanted to fucking scream. They tossed a rare "President Obama", but it was otherwise, "Today Obama, Obama, OBAMA, Mr. Obama, OBAMOMAMMA, OBAMA..." After a week, I hated Obama.
Perhaps more telling is what they don't report. Guess where the news was non-existent to painfully thin on 01/06? Fox was in total damage control mode. Even Carlson was trying to call Trump to end it. Imagine the panic as thousands of right-wingers stormed the Capital of the United States of America. Imagine trying to spin that!
Remember the Snowden leaks and when we all found out the government was spying on us? This was headline news all over the planet. I was forced to watch Fox for a solid week. Not one single mention. Why not? Fuck I know, they could have pointed the finger directly at Obama. Anyone know?
There's plenty more, like the token Democrat who gets to speak, but doesn't get to the really hammer-down points vs. the better looking, better presenting Republican. It goes on and on, and it's worse than you think.
Gods this part is awful. It's the tan suit/coffee salute/mustard bullshit. Yes. Obama did wear a tan suit, saluted marines (I think getting in Marine One), and ordered Dijon mustard on a sandwich. All true. Yet that's where it stopped and the rest was just biased trash dragging him for all the usual suspects of right wing hysteria.
This is what drives some of the anti-vax idiots. They are spoon fed studies or data that is usually factual alongside commentary and analysis that at best is described as "uneducated". I know one such idiot that can't understand proportions or rates. He was fed a study by his handlers of choice that showed 70% of covid deaths at some hospital were among vaccinated people. He reasoned that he'd rather be on the 30% side of that equation. He didn't care that over 90% of the population at that time was vaccinated and those vaccinations targeted elderly and other risky groups more likely to die. He couldn't understand that having 90% of a population vaccinated would result in those covid deaths being 90% vaccinated if it was truly ineffectual. Bro just kept bro-ing out with the "you can't argue with the numbers!" spiel.
My most vivid memories of Fox News were when the GWB administration was trying to build a case against Iraq, especially following 9/11. When it reached its boiling point and GWB called a press conference, I knew he was declaring war. The rhetoric had done its job.
Fox News talking heads later confirmed that they were receiving talking points from the White House during that era. It hasn’t ended.
Had to stay at home with parents during COVID quarantine w/ Fox News on almost 24/7, you're absolutely right. Also the "token democrat" is so biased to agree with soft conservative points, it's frustrating how many people fall for that trick.
Tulsi Gabbard rode that train all the way to the UN
I can’t watch it for the very reason you specify that the truth is distorted. The nuance and analysis are all one sided, deliberately omitting any depth or critical thought regarding the issues, and all designed to incite righteous anger. Yes, it’s the truth, but it’s not the whole truth, and sometimes it’s not even the objective truth.