this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

17698 readers
1 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml
wakest@lemmy.ml
1
A thought provoking thread on some of the downsides of Mastodon design (mastodon.social)
submitted 2 years ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Ferk@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'd argue it's search engines and social networks the ones that grant any level of "virality and discoverability ", not the internet itself. In the internet you need "third party" solutions for indexing or searching.

I mean, Mastodon probably intentionally lacks tools that enhance "virality and discoverability", but that's not the same thing as saying that it actively prevents information spread. You could in theory build a search engine for toots, or an alternate fork that does have those features. It's even free and open source software, so it's open to whatever.

[โ€“] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

Right, the internet is just a network that more complex things like social networks are built on top of. Hence why the question is with the design of Mastodon and completely unrelated to how the internet works fundamentally.

And I didn't say Mastodon actively prevents propagation, rather that some design decisions are at odds with viral propagation. It could be possible to build separate tooling on top, or to create forks that are more friendly towards propagation. However, Mastodon is by far the biggest ActivityPub based network right now, and the way it works plays a huge role for how Fediverse can be used at the moment.