this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
1041 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

60112 readers
1922 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

🖕 Fuck PayPal

And fuck Linus Tech Tips for intentionally keeping quiet about this after they found out.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 32 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Ltt didn't hide shit, they posted it on a public forum

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If only they had some medium to post the information, perhaps a medium that that VAST MAJORITY of their viewers use.

“But the plans were on display…”

“On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find them.”

“That’s the display department.”

“With a flashlight.”

“Ah, well, the lights had probably gone.”

“So had the stairs.”

“But look, you found the notice, didn’t you?”

“Yes,” said Arthur, “yes I did. It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying ‘Beware of the Leopard.”

I knew this was Douglas Adams by the tone but had to look it up to realize it was Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Time for a re-read!

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Their complaint was that honey inserted their affiliate cookie even when they didn't find a coupon code for you. I doubt they knew the full extent of the scam.

Plus, we don't know what was in their contract with honey. They could still be subject to a non-disparagement clause.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

GN doesn't seem to have a problem holding their sponsors accountable, putting a story together, doing their due diligence, and then letting everybody know.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 51 points 2 days ago (3 children)

They didn't hide it, but a huge portion of their audience doesn't read the forums. A 10 minute video of Linus ranting about them would have opened this scandal to a wider audience years ago.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago

And then they took sponsorships from Karma which does the exact same thing

[–] Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Linus usually likes to rant about it on the WAN show then they usually make a clip for YouTube, but weird he didn’t do that for honey, maybe he didn’t know how far the scam went.

[–] whats_all_this_then@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Especially considering he hasn't been shy about ranting about a lot of things from (insert latest apple thing) to "fucking eggshell"

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 days ago

As creator that makes some of their profits from affiliate links, I don't see how that could be the case for him.

Seems more likely they had a reason to avoid beef with PayPal.

[–] cocobean@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Could have a non disparagement clause in their former agreement

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

non disparagement clause

Not the level of a non-compete clause but that's a scummy thing I hope is not legal.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It's fairly common. As far as legal, that will depend on the jurisdiction and the mood of the judge.

[–] ebuttonsdude@ani.social 5 points 2 days ago

Linus said it would be on this week's WAN show

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

There may have been non-disclosure agreements between Linus tech tips and PayPal Honey. They may have threatened to sue him if he went public. I'm assuming we'll find out the details in the next few weeks.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 days ago

Yeah, that not nothing but it isn't far off. They have a massive platform. It deserved at least a video telling people about it.

[–] poke@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Some very vocal people on Lemmy just love hating on LTT. I don't think this topic was worth them making a main channel video on, I think their forum post was good and I believe they even mentioned this functionality of Honey a few times on the WAN show. It wasn't a secret, and anyone who cared to do in-depth research on a potential sponsor could have found out.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

They could have been exposed to legal liability to report on a business partner like that.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I don’t think this topic was worth them making a main channel video on

Their viewers getting scammed by tech they promoted isn't worth a video on their main channel? If they could legally do it I think they should have.

Some very vocal people on Lemmy just love hating on LTT

LTT have made mistakes (edit: and made choices/comments I would disprove of) but the dunking here does seem disproportionate.

[–] whats_all_this_then@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm definitely noticing a lot of hate warranted or not bjt it's honestly also been hard to defend them after their last "scandal". Once bitten twice shy...

Same reason I don't try to give CD Projekt RED the benefit of the doubt anymore even though I loved Cyberpunk despite the messed up launch, and it seems they've largely redeemed themselves - I now realize where their priorities lie.

[–] sardaukar@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And yet here's the scandal being exposed TWO YEARS LATER. Yeah, LTT couldn't possibly have handled this better... /s

[–] poke@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

They told everyone and nobody cared, turns out people care if a YouTube video is made framing the same thing differently. Like yeah, Honey's practice is bad for the creator industry, but is it bad enough to bring it back to the people who took their money? No, I don't think so.I think this is more of an example of how easy it is to get the masses angry with a YouTube video than anything. It's good that more people are going to move away from this information harvesting app, but I really feel like the reaction and hatred is overblown and, at least for the hatred towards creators, unwarranted.

The way I see it, people still take money from predatory gambling sites, and if any creator deserves pushback, it's them.