this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
75 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37801 readers
304 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] moody@lemmings.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Over time, as CPUs get better integrated graphics, it might be worth it. Essentially, if you're fine with playing last-gen games at ok framerates and you don't need maxed-out graphics, a mini PC is an option. If you want to play recent AAA blockbusters at 100fps, obviously it's a big no. But the next generation might get you close to those results on current-gen games.

[–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 1 points 2 days ago

There are already integrated graphics that can handle the most demanding games, like the ray-tracing-only Indiana Jones and the Golden Circle.