Programmer Humor

32727 readers

75 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

cat_programmer@lemmy.ml

570

Pride Versioning (lemmy.ml)

submitted 4 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I've noticed this and seeing it all laid out is hilarious. (So, so many JS frameworks omg)

Is this basically so they can forever say: "Well don't expect it to be feature complete, it's not even 1.0 yet!" ??

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

I don't think, it's as conscious of a decision. Projects above a certain level of complexity will just never realistically reach the criteria one might associate with a 1.0 (stable API, no known bugs, largely feature-complete). And then especially non-commercial projects just don't have an incentive to arbitrarily proclaim that they fulfill these criteria...