this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
62 points (100.0% liked)

worldnews

4831 readers
2 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil. Disagreements happen, that does not give you the right to personally insult each other.

  2. No racism or bigotry.

  3. Posts from sources that aren't known to be incredibly biased for either side of the spectrum are preferred. If this is not an option, you may post from whatever source you have as long as it is relevant to this community.

  4. Post titles should be the same as the article title.

  5. No spam, self-promotion, or trolling.

Instance-wide rules always apply.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Good news for NATO, bad news for Russia.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] designated_fridge@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

As a Swede (who is opposed to a NATO membership) - I must say what a shit show this has been and an embarrassment for NATO.

I get that if you're in a military alliance together, you need to not hate eachother but when every country need to ratify your membership it opens up for this kind of situation where a single country can hold an application hostage and try to get whatever they want because they simply don't like democracy.

[–] TTL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] designated_fridge@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think it's very reactionary. A decision like this should be taken through a public referendum and not in panic over Ukraine being invaded.

In addition, I think it's valuable with neutral countries rather than moving towards a world order where every country is either on USA's or Russia's side.

load more comments (1 replies)