this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
197 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1493 readers
108 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it may be a shock to learn this, but asking people things is how you find things out from them

I know it requires speaking to humans, alas, c’est la vie

[–] knightly@pawb.social -5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It may be a shock to learn this, but asking people things is how you find out what they think, not what is true.

I know proof requires more than just speaking to humans, alas, c'est la vie.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

did you know the report also publishes the details of its analysis methodology?

my god, where are you people coming from today

[–] knightly@pawb.social -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Did you know that all reputable surveys publish their methodology?

Did you know that, regardless of how you analyze the results, a survey is still just a survey?

If LLMs were worth the hype then you'd have actual proof of utility, not just sentiment.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is a pretty funny interaction when you realise that you just misread the froztbyte's self-reply (and the survey) as pro-AI, so you were just aggressively agreeing with each other all along

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

(why I was not as harsh as in earlier comments)

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 12 points 1 week ago

If LLMs were worth the hype then you’d have actual proof of utility

you think I'm promptfan-posting? impressive.