Technology

60123 readers

2778 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

506

Meta asks the US government to block OpenAI’s switch to a for-profit (www.theverge.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world

79 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Meta is asking California Attorney General Rob Bonta to block OpenAI’s planned transition from a non-profit to for-profit entity.

In a letter sent to Bonta’s office this week, Meta says that OpenAI “should not be allowed to flout the law by taking and reappropriating assets it built as a charity and using them for potentially enormous private gains.”

The letter, which was first reported on by The Wall Street Journal and you can read in full below, goes so far as to say that Meta believes Elon Musk is “qualified and well positioned to represent the interests of Californians in this matter.” Meta supporting Musk’s fight against OpenAI is notable given that Musk and Mark Zuckerberg were talking about literally fighting in a cage match just last year.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dont limit this to AI companies. All social media companies should be forced to become nonprofits and their code AGPL'd

[–] Loduz_247@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

But the AGPL does not prevent you from doing commercial activities

[–] nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Being nonprofit also doesn't prevent you from doing commercial activities.

But i think the idea would be if they are forced to be nonprofit and their code open-sourced then there is now transparency in how their LLMs are trained and operate.

But it's a bit silly to try to make AI companies nonprofits to begin with since they could just go to another country with "better" laws if they are punished too heavily in one country.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

People gotta eat. There's nothing wrong with selling open source software

The most important part is that the people and the government can see how the suggestion and feed algorithms are written, so they they can make them change them if they're found to lead to increased harm, such as suicides.