this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
225 points (96.3% liked)

politics

19246 readers
2491 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I think the reason there is pushback is because it's clear the justice system does a lot of protecting its own when the opposite should be the norm.

If you're a judge and you harm the public for personal benefit, you have harmed far more than a normal citizen is able to extend their harm. Further, you were put in a position to uphold the public trust and the law and you broke both.

In such a case, the punishment should unfortunately be much more extreme and the task re-integration into society should be much more rigorous, but because he was a judge they're like "skip all that, just pardon him." I think this guy needs a lot more re-integration than your standard violent offender because your standard violent offender wasn't a thoughtful calculating asshole. Violence is often committed without thought and with emotion. What this judge did was premeditated, thought out, executed, and flat out didn't care about the consequences to the individuals he harmed. He is, in many eyes, a much bigger danger to society because of how smart and calculating he is, and how he knows how to twist the law to his own favor. His knowledge of the law may literally give him a leg up in defending himself in court and in the eyes of the public. All this should be being considered before freeing him back to inflict more pain on society, as such men are wont to do, like Steve Bannon.

People are tired of seeing two different justice systems applied unevenly and then being told to swallow it and that it's not a big deal. Especially when white collar criminals regularly re-enter society to re-offend and take years to be brought to justice... again.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He wasn't pardoned.

I'm also sick of the 2 tier justice system. That doesn't mean I want all criminal rich fucks to suffer. It means I want all criminals to be equipped with the skills and support structures to be reintroduced.

[–] Chip_Rat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Nobody needs or wants that old shitty fuck to be reintroduced. Let him die in prison or on house arrest.