this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
87 points (97.8% liked)

Games

32979 readers
1286 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Virkkunen@fedia.io 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Patents are about how you achieve a goal, not the goal itself. You can have multiple parents on "switching for character to vehicle on top down 2D environment" as long as the means to do so are not the same.

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

In theory. In practice, software patents have pretty consistently been about the outcome and it's held up in court. This expired patent on sanity systems, for example.

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Sega had a patent on the transition between camera perspectives in a 3d racing game.

Everyone got around it being making the transition instantaneous.