this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5246 readers
354 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
7
The media covers only a narrow slice of climate research—one that inspires fear over action (www.anthropocenemagazine.org)
submitted 1 year ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Feweroptions@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is why you don't just "trust the science." Greed, egos, corruption, perverse incentives. There's a lot going on in the background that people are ignorant about.

[–] huskypenguin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I hope you're not suggesting that climate science shouldn't be trusted. The point of the article is that papers which discussed short term impacts on local communities could inspire more immediate change in individuals.

Anecdotally, what I've seen about these long term end of the 21st century studies, is that they've all been too conservative. How many climate headlines have you seen these past two years that have said "faster than expected"?