this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
767 points (98.6% liked)

Science Memes

11456 readers
889 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Here we see the illusive billionaire in its natural habitat

[–] terminally_offline@infosec.pub 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Elusive*, you'll probably try to correct me and say that you meant "illusive" but that's not the right use-case for it anyway.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Here we see the illusive pedant in its natural habitat

[–] psud@aussie.zone 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not pedantry to point out your word choice was so completely wrong. Illusive is descriptive of things that are illusions (a mirage is illusive water); elusive is descriptive of something that is hard to find

[–] my_hat_stinks@programming.dev -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Correcting" someone in a casual setting when they clearly communicated their ideas in a way that was understood by the majority of the audience without issue is pedantry, or more specifically linguistic prescriptivism. If their meaning was unclear you'd ask what they meant to say, when you tell someone what they meant to say you obviously understood them and are just being pedantic.

[–] onwardknave@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is the internet, and I welcome such pedantry.

[–] my_hat_stinks@programming.dev -1 points 2 weeks ago

Okay? If you want to "correct" people who didn't ask you go ahead, but all you're really doing is pointlessly derailing conversations. And if you cry about it when people call you out for being a dick that's more than a little pathetic.

[–] terminally_offline@infosec.pub -5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ignoramus will be an ignoramus.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 week ago

ignore anus? man i try to

Elusive*, you'll probably try to correct me and say that you meant "illusive" but that's not the right use-case for it anyway.