this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
119 points (81.8% liked)

Fediverse

17734 readers
163 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml
wakest@lemmy.ml
119
Establishing a new Fediquette (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Zozano@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
129 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Old habits die hard, but there's Reddiquette which needs to be revived, and some which needs to die.

Many "golden-age" redditors remember a time when downvoting was reserved for hostility, not a different opinion. For the sake of our growing community I would like to implore everyone to be awesome to each other.

However, this place is not Reddit.

  • We don't measure in bananas here.
  • We don't need to append "edit: typo" to edited posts and comments.
  • if you see something which is worthy of a downvote: down vote and move on! Don't engage with it and feed the algorithm/engament machine so other people are exposed to it when sorting by active.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not really an algorithm, you see posts based on the type and sort order you select. Sorting by "hot" counts votes, sorting by "active" counts posts. My default is Subscribed and New. When I get through all the new stuff I check Active and Hot.

In any case, yeah there's stuff I hope not to see here. So far so good and hopefully it will stay that way for a while.

[–] CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

I mean, a sorting algorithm is still an algorithm, just a very straightforward one. The good kind of algorithm.

[–] Zozano@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fixed it to be more precise.

I suppose whether it's an algorithm comes down to which definition you use.

I think the colloquial definition is something which is user-dependant and very complicated.

However, the dictionary definition is "a finite set of unambiguous instructions", which fits my initial usage.

Strangely though, the colloquial definition doesn't fit the dictionary definition, because the YouTube/Twitter/Facebook algorithms are so ambiguous that the people designing them don't really know what they're doing, since they are evolving by themselves.

[–] rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah it's semantics, but to me an algorithm includes some kind of code to do something I'm not aware of or have control over, like a section of code that does a job in the background. In this case I think of something that pre-selects which content to put on my front page based on some logic I have no control over.

[–] Guitarguru2001@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So... Elsewhere in this thread you keep stating that explaining why something is edited is not useful. But here I have no idea what your previous statement was or what you edited, and because you didn't explain why you edited, I'm left guessing what your previous statement was.

This is precisely why people explain why they edit, otherwise the conversation loses context as edits occur. Hopefully you can step back and see why explaining edits is useful?

[–] Zozano@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You actually don't need to know what my previous statement was, because it's totally boring.

I changed "algorithm" to "algorithm/engagement machine" because the first posts were about how the word algorithm is used.

To clarify, my gripe was not with edits, it's to state that you edited for typos specifically.