In America, the right to bear arms goes hand in hand with its dislike of regulation. Maybe the system is working the way it was intended for the first time?

If you were to continue killing CEOs, eventually the CEOs would call for change themselves. One dead CEO isn't going to change that. Hypothetically, of course.

I actually agree with you, but I don't see the regulation playing out in our favor. If anything, any future regulation will only increase the despotism against the 99%, which will in turn result in more of this. The other comments regarding the right to bear arms, and the founding concepts of throwing off despotism seem to be at play here. Instead of killing the lawmakers, this assassination went right to the source, corporations.

It wasn't "right" for the continental army to shoot and kill british soldiers either, but it was also very very right to wage that war.

Baby steps.

Yeah I’m sure there’s a new CEO now, but consider that whatever schmuck ends up in that chair next knows he’s taking over from a predecessor that was deposed for wildly unpopular policies at the helm to hold profits over people.

Mr schmuck will definitely be sweating it when faced with similar decisions because fear of it affecting him personally, e.g. catching a bullet, is a real possibility. I guarantee you that thought has never crossed any of these CEOs minds before this happened.

All the assassin did was force them to understand they have skin in the game.

How badly do they want more money? How does the calculus shake out with this new variable of self preservation? Is it worth looking over your shoulder every time walking down the street?

This is why people are arguing it’s the trolley problem