Linux

47290 readers

637 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

Is there any reason NOT to use openSUSE Tumbleweed as a desktop OS? (sopuli.xyz)

submitted 1 year ago by ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz to c/linux@lemmy.ml

44 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It seems like its a perfect distro. Rolling release so you get recent packages and dont have huge upgrades every few months, but not so bleeding edge that it breaks often. YaST is pretty cool but you are not forced to use it. Basic installation gives you enough essential stuff, but its not too bloated. The only thing its missing is AUR, but i still didnt find a program that i need and cant find in official repos or trough flatpak.

Honestly, now that i use it, it seems like insanity to install anything else. (for everyday desktop use)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kabe@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Here are a few reasons I can think why some may not take to it. Trigger warning for Suse users

Out-of-the-box aesthetics are pretty ugly (why are they still using that godawful default wallpaper?)
Yast looks like the Windows 95 control panel (I guess this might be a plus for some people?)
Zypper can be sluggish to update and install packages
regular package updates are large, even compared to Arch
Seems to have more frequent security/password prompts (a good thing for enterprise scenarios, but not always welcome or necessary on a personal PC)

It's not bad by any means, but I've tried it out several times and always ended up abandoning it because of little niggles like the above.

[–] Richardisaguy@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Software avaliability can be a bit scarce too, mainly when compared to fedora or even arch's aur

[–] Mane25@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yast to me looks reassuringly old and sturdy.

[–] kabe@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I can see why that may appeal to some people. Personally, I prefer a more modern look.

[–] dandroid@dandroid.app 4 points 1 year ago

My work is exclusively SUSE, and I just can stand zypper. It's so slow, and I feel like it is always complaining about compatibility issues.

[–] KotoWhiskas@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Also it would sacrifice user experience over "security" - i.e. with default SElinux config proton may not work correctly - see this bug

[–] whoami@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago

yast can be ugly, but effective. And aesthetics are definitely subjective. Agree about zypper though.