this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
903 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19246 readers
3696 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump has exempted himself from key ethics guidelines required under the Presidential Transition Act, which he signed into law in 2020.

By rejecting federal funding for his transition team, Trump avoids donor limits and disclosure requirements, raising concerns about conflicts of interest and transparency.

Critics, including Senator Elizabeth Warren and government watchdogs, warn that Trump’s refusal to submit an ethics plan undermines accountability and could open the door to corruption.

This move marks a break from precedent and has sparked alarm over potential personal enrichment during his presidency.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 77 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The "United" States of America is over.

We're gonna end up with the "Blue States of America" and the "Republic of Jesusland"

[–] Alenalda@lemmy.world 51 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

you see that's the thing, its not exactly blue stats. its blue city's, islands surrounded by hundreds of miles of red oceans

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Lets be honest, average iq of the red ocean is negative, theres no "people" there. And for the record i live in red ocean

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago

I'm in the purple ocean! But our laws are very very red

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Rural/urban divide is not unique to the US in any way whatsoever. Also, expect polarization to self perpetuate as blue voters move to blue states and red states to move to red states.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Turkey is very similar in this regard. Progressive cities, backwards countryside.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

It’s also roughly the size and population of Texas alone. Does it have a wildly unfair Electoral College?

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago

Whoa, lets call it like it is. There will be blue states, and there will be welfare states.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Me in Europe for the first time a long time ago asking the same question in every country and getting the truth from a woman in Rome: "oh, we don't hate the Jews. You're fine here.... But leave the cities.... Yeah, it's like anywhere"

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

That red ocean is like 3 people on a fucking farm or in a trailer.

An ocean of empty land.

[–] coyootje@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

I saw a post about that the other day, it showed a map of all the states with populations smaller than LA county. Almost every single red state was highlighted. Really shows you how silly the electoral college system is.