this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
318 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19246 readers
2903 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 64 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Crime Bill Biden ran out the clock on purpose. He never had any intention to reschedule cannabis.

NONE.

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

The only meaningful change for this would be via legislation, otherwise trump can just as easily undo it the same day.

Edit: looks like the process is much more complicated and actually Biden already started the process at the beginning of this year (April): https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/update-deas-efforts-reschedule-cannabis-what-you-need-know-2024-09-11/ , I don't understand this article

Edit 2: the letter is actually asking him to try to hurry the process up (the article from September that I linked says there supposed to be hearing scheduled this Monday (Dec 2nd)). It is very misleading (as you can see from the comments), because it implies Biden is just ignoring this issue completely.

https://lee.house.gov/imo/media/doc/letter_to_biden_admin_re_marijuana.pdf

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

He actually started the process to review what it was scheduled as to get it changed in 2022. It like everything else surrounding our government takes forever.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-submits-proposed-regulation-reschedule-marijuana

[–] Starbuck@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Everything with government doesn’t have to be slow, but congress wrote this bill so that two successive presidents would have to keep pursuing it.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It like everything else surrounding our government takes forever.

Unless of course it's something he wants to do, like sell weapons for an ongoing genocide. Then all bureaucracy evaporates into nothingness.

His hands are untied when he wants them to be.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Look, I get that you’re trying to make a point, but this is like complaining your parents were able to pay the mortgage every week but not buy you a new bike. One is planned, budgeted, agreed upon by all parties. The other is something you want, that takes time and planning which has yet to take place.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago

Giving away arms to a genocide isn't... budgeted.

What line item(s) can you point to for "Palestinian Genocide Budget"?

There's literally a law on the books that says he MUST stop arms transfers to Israel, since the UN has declared an ongoing genocide.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So the genocide was planned and agreed upon before hand?

[–] capital@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

This is the type of level-headed, honest discussion I came here from reddit for.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

As far as centrists are concerned, genocide is as vital as shelter.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

The other is something you want, that takes time and planning which has yet to take place.

One is something Biden wanted, and the other is rescheduling cannabis.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Trump can just undo it anyway. What's the point. And saying that's not how its done is pointless cause they don't play by the rules.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

looks like the process is much more complicated and actually Biden already started the process at the beginning of this year

Right. He waited until it couldn't be completed until after the end of his term. On purpose. He ran out the clock. On purpose.

He never wanted to reschedule cannabis and dragged his feet until he didn't have to.

[–] capital@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You still haven't learned that US legal precedent is God king. New rules dropped, presidential acts are all the rage. Biden just has to say those two words and he can regulate how long your ball hair is allowed to be.

[–] capital@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

All that needs to happen is for SCOTUS to agree.

Should be easy 👍

[–] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Doesn't fuckin matter. Let SCOTUS mull it over for years. Drag it out through court for 4 years to see if he was allowed to do what he did do. Someone tries to reverse what he did? Fire them, let SCOTUS figure out for 4 years if he was allowed to do that too. Convince 20 lawyers to fight it until they are literally disbarred. I'm sick of democrats fussing over decorum and tradition and just giving this country away because they're afraid of some vague rules. Make shit up. Not allowed to fire that person? Spin up some special cabinet packed with cronies and make that person report to them now. Literally anything. But biden won't do shit. He's taking a fucking nap, leave him alone.

[–] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Considering they already did, I'd say so.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You miss the part where the court gets to decide what is or isn't an "official act"?

[–] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Sure, if the court case goes before them, on average of 4 years after the actual crime. But seeing as the Jan 6th case was thrown out, it won't matter what that determination would be if ignoring the Constitution and attempting to overthrow the government isn't past the line.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

No the Democrats haven't learned that, and are still taking the high ground.