this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
3153 points (99.2% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29056 readers
7 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news ๐Ÿ˜

Outages ๐Ÿ”ฅ

https://status.lemmy.world/

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations ๐Ÿ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

While I was asleep, apparently the site was hacked. Luckily, (big) part of the lemmy.world team is in US, and some early birds in EU also helped mitigate this.

As I am told, this was the issue:

  • There is an vulnerability which was exploited
  • Several people had their JWT cookies leaked, including at least one admin
  • Attackers started changing site settings and posting fake announcements etc

Our mitigations:

  • We removed the vulnerability
  • Deleted all comments and private messages that contained the exploit
  • Rotated JWT secret which invalidated all existing cookies

The vulnerability will be fixed by the Lemmy devs.

Details of the vulnerability are here

Many thanks for all that helped, and sorry for any inconvenience caused!

Update While we believe the admins accounts were what they were after, it could be that other users accounts were compromised. Your cookie could have been 'stolen' and the hacker could have had access to your account, creating posts and comments under your name, and accessing/changing your settings (which shows your e-mail).

For this, you would have had to be using lemmy.world at that time, and load a page that had the vulnerability in it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

yup that's the one

what I find weird is that the "fix" still focuses only on the front-end, the issue is still that unescaped HTML is being stored in the database and still trusting the front-end is nuts

[โ€“] Redex68@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I mean, I'm pretty sure that for an XSS attack that's fine. The entire problem is that somebody posts e.g. a comment that contains code that is automatically run in users' browsers. If you make the front end just not execute that code then it's fine. Who cares what's stored in the back end?

I mean, it would still be better to have multiple fail-safes, and they probably should still sanitize text entering the database.

But this is sufficient for a quick fix.

[โ€“] solrize@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let me introduce you to my friend, Little Bobby Tables... :)

[โ€“] luthis@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

ALWAYS SANITISE!

[โ€“] TheVampireSaga@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I think people are forgetting that it's somewhat obvious the hackers or whomever, I don't really care honestly are Lemmy users considering they did this at night and got into the site so quickly to begin with, they'd have to have been familiar with it to get into it as fast as they did.

If anything everything should be fixed.

[โ€“] gabriele97@lemmy.g97.top 6 points 1 year ago

For sure it is sufficient for a quick fix. But a Lemmy post can be posted not only on Lemmy but on other front ends (like kbin, mastodon, and many others) and they can suffer from a similar attack due to the backend storing and forwarding the bad content. So, it should not be stored as it is in the backend

[โ€“] TheVampireSaga@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think the main developers are aware of either of them but I'm not sure, haven't seen anyone site admin wise talk about this mess.

[โ€“] ElectroNeutrino@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This discussion on the original bug report does talk about the back-end needing a fix as well.

[โ€“] ugh@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

The devs are aware

[โ€“] mathers@l.mathers.fr 2 points 1 year ago

I think it makes sense to escape as close as possible to the context where the data will be used, see https://benhoyt.com/writings/dont-sanitize-do-escape/