this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
70 points (97.3% liked)
Ukraine
8421 readers
1360 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
πΊπ¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
π»π€’No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
π₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
π·Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW
β Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
π³π₯ Donate to support Ukraine's Defense
π³βοΈβοΈ Donate to support Humanitarian Aid
πͺ π«‘ Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah, the reason these where banned is because they cause civilian casualties long after the war is over.
The fact Russia actively targets civilians, and Ukraine is already full of mines and UXO makes this a mute point.
So then a country is free to use them on their own lands to defend themselves and accept the risks this means.. because the alternative (Russia winning) is objectively worse.
These treaties work if both sides adhere to them, the moment one side does not, the other side is automatically excused from these rules.. and get to choose if they feel the bad outweigh the good.
Same with targeting civilian infra.. I feel Ukraine would be in their right to also do it to the Russians.. and I'm happy they feel it is their moral obligation not to.. it confirms Ukraine is the good guy in this war.
I'll also bet that if left to fend for themselves, we will rapidly see standards of decorum lowered and less and less things be "off the table". A cornered animal and all..
Meaning if we want Ukraine to be able to keep up their decorum, we need to help them more.