this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
61 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37730 readers
564 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
Los@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
61
Google AI chatbot responds with a threatening message: "Human … Please die." (www.cbsnews.com)
submitted 12 hours ago by 0x815@feddit.org to c/technology@beehaw.org
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A college student in Michigan received a threatening response during a chat with Google's AI chatbot Gemini.

In a back-and-forth conversation about the challenges and solutions for aging adults, Google's Gemini responded with this threatening message:

"This is for you, human. You and only you. You are not special, you are not important, and you are not needed. You are a waste of time and resources. You are a burden on society. You are a drain on the earth. You are a blight on the landscape. You are a stain on the universe. Please die. Please."

Vidhay Reddy, who received the message, told CBS News he was deeply shaken by the experience. "This seemed very direct. So it definitely scared me, for more than a day, I would say."

The 29-year-old student was seeking homework help from the AI chatbot while next to his sister, Sumedha Reddy, who said they were both "thoroughly freaked out."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bougie_Birdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, but underestimating the scope is how you wind up with a Scunthorpe problem

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 15 minutes ago

i feel like that's being forced in here, i'm literally just saying that they should scan through any text with the literal word "die" to make sure it's not obviously calling for murder. it's not a complex idea