this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
393 points (93.4% liked)
> Greentext
7541 readers
619 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think what would give cavemen pause would be if the house was on fire for 20,000 years.
That said, we definitely should have stayed on nuclear.
Don't know why you're being down voted, that's accurate. Dresden was set fucking alight like 80 years ago and was rebuilt. Chernobyl?
And yes, it's arguably cleaner than most fuel, just know what yours doing and don't put it on a flood plane!
Their comment agitates both the "nuclear bad" crowd and the "nuclear good" crowd :(
Ahhh, I get ya.
Chernobyl shows that worst case scenario is that we get large wildlife preserves.
And we shoot everything that may potentially cross the border of such preserve for we don't know wtf can happen if a contaminated animal breed outside of such area.