this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
1236 points (90.2% liked)

Memes

45581 readers
2213 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You consider humans superior in intellect and ability compared to all other animals yet can't grasp the fact that some humans have chosen to use said superior intellect and ability to avoid killing other animals?

[–] s_s@lemmy.one 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You consider humans superior in intellect and ability compared to all other animals

Does he?

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Isn't that usually the argument that anti-vegans use? That we're the top predator due to our intelligence and technology and therefore we have an intrinsic right to the lives of other animals?

[–] The_Mixer_Dude@lemmus.org 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah they have definitely tried that angle in the past

[–] f1g4@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago

That would be an incredibly bad argument. Because it's not a motive, it's just descriptive. "we're at the top so we have the right" it's just a claim we make for ourself without considering how we got there.. and what if a smarter, more advanced alien race would come down to earth and conquer us? Would they agree that since they are top of the chain now they have "the right" to slaughter us? Obviously not. So then we would claim: "we're smart! Look, we know math. And love.. we also feel pain.". So these are important to us.

[–] SpiritSilver@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nope. My argument is simple. Steak tastes good.

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Honestly that's a better argument. At least it's truthful and shows your real priorities and isn't trying to get fake philosophical as a cover.