this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
139 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37800 readers
412 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I...didn't think windows 12 was actually a thing but here we are?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ziviz@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

They are necessitating 8GB of RAM. for what?! Like, it would be a struggle to find a machine with less than 8GB still being sold new, sure, but why does the OS need that RAM?

[–] TheTrueLinuxDev@beehaw.org 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Microsoft: "Gotta keep all of the telemetries and AI running 24/7 of course!"

[–] can@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Every day I'm closer to trying Linux again.

[–] Zeroxxx@lemmy.my.id 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Please do? What is stopping you anyway?

[–] vlad76@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As someone who has moved from Windows to Linux and has been using it as primary OS for everything and gaming; it's not ready.

I love Linux. But it's not there. It's for tech savvy people. It's simply not user friendly enough for the "normies". I hope it'll happen one day.

[–] Qualanqui@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm no "normie" but Linux is so damned ass backwards my brain just can't cope, some of the times I was unsure if I was asking the OS to change directory or summon Moloch to bring a thousand years of darkness to the world.

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Linux always had the problem of highly technical people building wonderful things with a GUI that looks like it was designed by a third grader. Mainly because the majority of Linux contributors think the GUI is some fad that will blow over soon. I'm exaggerating of course, the last 10 years has seen some massive improvements. But the GUI being an afterthought still has a bit of truth to it.

[–] can@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

You exaggerate but only slightly.

[–] vlad76@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

I get how you feel. A lot of your existing Windows knowledge is not applicable to Linux so you feel like an old fart that doesn't understand computers when you first start using it.

That being said. Now that I'm over that hump, I get why all the linux nerds are so militant about it. It is an objectively better experience if you compare it to Windows from a power user level. It's a lot like gaming on a PC. Yes, you have to build it. Yes, you have to tinker with games to get them to run "just right". But it is a better experience once you get there.

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

How is Linux with flight sticks? With Steam now available in Linux, lots of game compatibility is taken care of, but I would love my peripherals to work as well.

[–] nakukono@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

Fedora linux: If Microsoft does this why not us?

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not that the OS needs that amount of RAM, it's that it's lifting the floor for what a modern PC will have, which is a good thing. I can't wait for the day windows requires an SSD.

[–] briongloid@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago

I mean, Windows 10+ should only be used on an SSD for the OS install, even if it's not explicitly required.

So long as it doesn't outright block us from doing what we choose to on our PC's, there should be a recommended settings minimum that differs from the minimum.

[–] KluEvo@wirebase.org 7 points 1 year ago

Maybe because most programs you'd use (browser, word processor, spreadsgeets, etc) requires 8+ gb, and the non-windows side of MS wanted the requirements so edge, word, excel, etc are guaranteed to actually work on every computer that ships with those programs?

[–] totallynotfbi@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be honest, I think 8 GB is a more realistic requirement for light tasks nowadays, but not because of Windows - even Windows 10 would struggle with Chrome, Word, Excel, etc on just 4 GB, and I can't imagine that W11 is any better. Increasing the requirements would ensure that OEMs won't put Windows 12 on shitbox PCs with 4 GB and call them usable, just because they meet the bare-minimum standards.

[–] ziviz@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I guess. It seems wasteful to need 8GB just to run an OS and browser especially after Microsoft was pushing server core specifically to go the opposite route with resource utilization on servers.