this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
92 points (91.1% liked)

Crazy Fucking Videos

5657 readers
244 users here now

Dive into the World of Insane Videos!

Rules

  1. No hate speech of any kind.
  2. Content warnings are required in post titles where applicable. Example: [CW: Injury]
  3. Use your best judgement and mark NSFW posts as such.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
MutatedBass@lemmy.world
dylpickles@lemmy.world
TimeNaan@lemmy.world
92
Dutch cops beat up pro-Palestine protesters (i.imgur.com)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to c/crazyfuckingvideos@lemmy.world
42 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Alleged context (feel free to correct if you have info in comments):

After Israeli Maccabi hooligans terrorized Amsterdam, the Dutch government demonized the pro-Palestine movement and banned protests. People came to protest anyways (peacefully)

The police arrested peaceful protesters and put them in a bus. They were driven to a parking lot. The police released them from the bus in a parking lot near a station.

While the protesters were walking to the station the police started hitting them. Allegedly for not moving fast enough.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not silly. It is the most reasonable lens through which to examine the citizen's relationship with police: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly_on_violence

[โ€“] GBU_28@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Normalizing via speech is entrenching this very problem. I'm not saying this thread is gonna tip the scales, I'm discussing that the above commenter replied as if it's the right response. They are condoning and almost evangelizing the topic (evangelizing is way too active a word, I can't think of a better one, but this one is too much).

I think there's distinction between your raising the issue that police have a monopoly on violence, and their commenting that violence is their job. Given the context, it comes off as they are saying "it is correct and GOOD that the police met this group with violence."

I contend it is not appropriate, but accept that is is common (even systemically so)