poore-nemecek is based on misreading LCA studies. LCA as a measurement is not transferable between studies. poore-nemececk just went through and did averages. it's not good science. it's not even science.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Do you have a source more reputable than the Science journal and the Oxford university?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

the papers themselves. look at their LCA references

[–] oce@jlai.lu 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I don't have the current knowledge nor the time to reach the level of researchers in the domain to make my own meta analysis. Where can I read a reputable rebuttal to this meta analysis?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

you can read the sources that poore-nemecek cite. they are explicit that their research cannot be combined with other LCAs

[–] oce@jlai.lu 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I am skeptical that researchers and reviewers of Science wouldn't have accounted for that. I made some research about rebuttal to this study, so far the only ones I have found are from farmer related or anti-vegan communities, which are likely more biased than a scientific journal. I will need at least a contradictory peer reviewed article to convince me this meta analysis is incorrect.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

if the source material can't convince you, then live in ignorance

[–] oce@jlai.lu 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

When you are not an expert of the domain, it is easy to get mislead by arguments such as the one you gave, maybe you're correct, maybe you're misleading, I don't have the knowledge to verify by myself. That's why I need to rely on reputable source, and it's hard to do more reputable than a meta-analysis in Science. If you are correct, the rebuttal will eventually be published in a peer reviewed journal, I'll will be happy to read the conclusions then.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

it's stated explicitly in the papers cited by poore-nemecek. all you need to do is read