this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
420 points (99.3% liked)

196

16431 readers
1698 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ravhall@discuss.online 20 points 14 hours ago (13 children)

Guns are surprisingly easy to come by. For now.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (7 children)
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 25 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The gun isn't to fight the military. It's to protect against random acts of political violence.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I would expect more political violence had Harris won. With Trump as the winner, wouldn’t violent hate crimes be the bigger concern?

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 22 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Under the first Trump presidency, there was a substantial increase in politically motivated hate crime. So the answer to your question is both are true. If your existence isn't a political issue, then you should still get armed to defend the people around you.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)