this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
193 points (97.5% liked)

News

23293 readers
3394 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 83 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Incendiary devices found at shipping hubs could be Moscow putting pressure on West not to support Ukraine

Yeah, that’s totally how countries react to terrorist attacks.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, that’s totally how countries react to terrorist attacks.

In the words of a recently departed music star: "We'll put a boot in yer ass, it's the American way"

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm curious whether the putin-loving republican party would change their stance if Russia were to blow up a plane, or claim it's a Ukrainian false flag.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Nothing that outlandish.

It will clearly be blamed on Jewish space lasers.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's how we've reacted to their aggression so far.

Bullies always assume they're the strong ones and everyone else knows they're secretly really weak in comparison.

We watched for years as the nazis rampaged across Europe, it hurts to watch that again.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysia_Airlines_Flight_17?wprov=sfla1

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It’s how we’ve reacted to their aggression so far.

The United States really does not want to get into a direct conflict with Russia. There's no question that we'd win any kind of conventional conflict but the American people have no desire for another land war in Europe. We've been there and done that, twice, and while I think we would support our European cousins for a 3rd go around getting support for it would require that the Europeans commit themselves first.

On a tangent but speaking frankly Europe as a whole needs to plan for dwindling support from the United States. Regardless of who wins the 2024 US elections the voting demographics of the United States are changing fast. There are literally tens of millions of current and near future immigrants from all over the world who will never care about European security as much as the current voters do. Why would they? Why should they?

The average immigrant from Asia or Latin America will not have ancestral ties to Europe and as their impact on US politics grows it's inevitable that US support for European shenanigans will dwindle. As voters they will push the US Government to care far more about what's happening in India, Mexico, Guatemala, Venezuela, and various countries on the African continent.

This is going to happen even if the United States elects nothing but Progressive Politicians for the next 10 election cycles and Europe needs to prepare for it.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The people don't, but the geopolitical structure does.

So, we spent, literally a decade trying to squish China and Russia together as allies, because Russia is the shittiest ally you can have, and, much like in WW1, you can guarantee both erratic foreign policy and failure on the battlefield (Russia being Austria-Hungary in this case, as the Germans called it "being shackled to a corpse"), while also enabling isolation of both (Russia has a lot of enemies, like ... basically everybody hates them and wants to see them suffer).

You are 100% correct Europe needs to stand up and deal with this, and that was the plan, but between China's reticence to act and their current economic woes, and Russia's general failure in combat (they were never expected to be this weak), the US is actually in a position to act, maybe not sending in boots on the ground, but air and drone support.

The key is the Sino-Russian axis being isolated and weakened before anything meaningful happens. Nobody wants a real war, the goal is a cold war that results in China and Russia grumbling loudly at how mean the west is to them. That's working btw, it's going well, aided by China's economic issues and Xi's obsession with domestic power over all else.

The alternative is an actual hot war, and that's a lot worse for everybody.

I know the reaction is to think "why can't we all get along?" but the problem is, the stakes for states, are impossibly high, life and death, so you have to always play the right move, because other states will act in their own brutal self-interest (see Russia), and when there's no higher authority to appeal to, you either make the right move, or you end up on the dustbin of history.

Btw, China is fine with this: Russia ends up wholly reliant, so China can basically get as many resources as they want, and land/food/etc. Over time China eats Siberia, and Russia can't do anything to stop it, but the oligarchs get paid well for selling out their country. win/win/win.