this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
204 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37711 readers
397 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Fairphone isn't privacy-focused, it's just a highly repairable device for what it is.

The Fairphone is just hardware. Privacy is mostly about software.

I think it's difficult to have both a privacy-focused & repairable platform in the form factor of a mobile phone right now - no manufacturer cares to make such a device

FFS did no one actually read the OP?

[–] lemann@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

The Fairphone is just hardware. Privacy is mostly about software

I was thinking more from the perspective of how much the closed-source proprietary hardware in the Fairphone can be trusted to guarantee your privacy. I had devices like the Pinephone and Librem phone in mind, which provide physical switches for the camera, microphone, GPS and mobile modem.

Another user gave the example I would have used here, where the GPS subsystem in Qualcomm devices freely uses the mobile modem mostly outside of the OS's control to download satellite almanac updates whenever it needs to, and submitting identifiers for your device over unencrypted HTTP

FFS did no one actually read the OP?

Yep. Personally I see e/OS on the Fairphone as a solid combo for allowing someone to slowly degoogle and take back control without giving up too many creature comforts. It 100% fulfils the software aspect of privacy IMO for the intended user.

It's primarily the hardware trust aspect that I was thinking about when I wrote my earlier response. Personally, I'm just interested in privacy from the perspective of controlling my data and knowing what's done with it