U.S. News

2244 readers

104 users here now

News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.

Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.

Guidelines for submissions:

Post the original source of information as the link.
If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
Social media is not a news source.

For World News, see the News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

Powderhorn@beehaw.org

We are about to watch the collapse of journalism in real time. (beehaw.org)

submitted 2 weeks ago by Powderhorn@beehaw.org to c/usnews@beehaw.org

64 comments fedilink hide all child comments

What is happening with editorial boards is not normal. You need to understand this first.

They are not part of the newsroom, so anyone telling you that is lying. What happened at the LAT and WaPo are the beginning. Have you not read history? They come for you. You just think it's more steps away.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It looked a fuckload better when the alternative was venture capital. I wrote a post praising Bezos at the time, which didn't age well.

[–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

WaPo could certainly have done worse. It's not unreasonable to expect that a billionaire might look after a newspaper like a rare classic car or other vanity purchase, that he would be content to keep it running nicely even if it's ostensibly a poor investment.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

A poor investment would be an improvement.