this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Fediverse

3 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the federated social networking ecosystem, which includes decentralized and open-source social media platforms. Whether you are a user, developer, or simply interested in the concept of decentralized social media, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as the benefits and challenges of decentralized social media, new and existing federated platforms, and more. From the latest developments and trends to ethical considerations and the future of federated social media, this category covers a wide range of topics related to the Fediverse.

founded 2 years ago
 

I've checked the fedipact signatories, but they all seem to be lemmy instances.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] the_thunder_god@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I disagree that the admin of an instance doesn't have the right to moderate it how they wish. By joining the server you agree to let that admin control what content you see on your instance. That's how instances work. It's still on you to agree/disagree with the admin and how they run the server. That's why other servers exist and you have the complete right to associate with who you wish, or even run your own instance and run it how you like.

I do not agree with the people wanting to control other servers by trying to force defederating from threads. Independent admins running their own server is what the Fediverse is built upon.

[โ€“] Kichae@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

This.

The nature of the Fediverse is that if you don't agree with your admin's running of things, you can pick a new admin. Or become one yourself.

The admin has every right to decide what their website interacts with.